Proposal: Do we want our future children to walk on a “carpet of flowers” or on a “carpet of trash”?
Testing the impact of metaphorical language on environmental concern.
The above-mentioned quote is from the environmental activist Haïda El Ali, who has dedicated his whole life to the renaturation of the mangrove forest. The metaphors powerfully illustrate the responsibility we have for future generations. Previous research has shown that metaphorical compared to non-metaphorical language increases the comprehensibility of information (e.g., Casarett et al., 2010), enhances attention (e.g., Fernandez-Duque & Johnson, 2002), and facilitates its memorization (e.g., Pearson et al., 1981). There has been much research on the use of metaphorical language in medicine (Casarett et al., 2010; Hendricks et al., 2018), education (Duit, 1991; Pearson et al., 1981), and various social contexts (Panzeri et al., 2021; Schnepf & Christmann, in press). To date, little research has been done on the effects of metaphors in relation to crucial environmental problems. Psychological framing research has focused on abstract phenomena such as “the climate” or “the environment” (Flusberg et al., 2017; Hardisty et al., 2010), but less attention has been paid on concrete consequences such as floods, extreme heat, droughts, or the global waste problem. The aim of this study is to test whether the use of metaphorical compared to non-metaphorical frames for concrete environmental issues affect people’s environmental concern, their willingness to act and to donate for related pro-environmental programs. For this purpose, an experiment is planned in which two concrete environmental issues are labeled with a metaphorical frame versus a non-metaphorical frame. This results in four experimental conditions (issue x frame). To be able to identify a small framing effect, 600 participants will be needed. The study will take about 7 minutes. Therefore, a budget of £739.20 is needed.
Researchgate account: Julia SCHNEPF | PhD Student | Master of Arts | Universität Koblenz-Landau, Koblenz | Faculty of Psychology
Casarett, D., Pickard, A., Fishman, J. M., Alexander, S. C., Arnold, R. M., Pollak, K. I., & Tulsky, J. A. (2010). Can metaphors and analogies improve communication with seriously ill patients?. Journal of Palliative Medicine , 13 (3), 255-260. http://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2009.0221
Duit, R. (1991). On the role of analogies and metaphors in learning science. Science Education , 75 (6), 649-672.
Fernandez-Duque, D., & Johnson, M. L. (2002). Cause and effect theories of attention: The role of conceptual metaphors. Review of General Psychology , 6 (2), 153-165. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-26220.127.116.11
Flusberg, S. J., Matlock, T., & Thibodeau, P. H. (2017). Metaphors for the war (or race) against climate change. Environmental Communication , 11 (6), 769-783. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2017.1289111
Hardisty, D. J., Johnson, E. J., & Weber, E. U. (2010). A dirty word or a dirty world? Attribute framing, political affiliation, and query theory. Psychological Science , 21 (1), 86–92. SAGE Journals: Your gateway to world-class journal research
Hendricks, R. K., Demjén, Z., Semino, E., & Boroditsky, L. (2018). Emotional implications of metaphor: Consequences of metaphor framing for mindset about cancer. Metaphor and Symbol , 33 (4), 267-279. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2018.1549835
Panzeri, F., Di Paola, S., & Domaneschi, F. (2021). Does the COVID-19 war metaphor influence reasoning?. Plos One , 16 (4), e0250651.
Pearson, P. D., Raphael, T. E., Tepaske, N., & Hyser, C. (1981). The function of metaphor in children’s recall of expository passages. Journal of Reading Behavior , 13 (3), 249-261.
Schnepf, J., & Christmann, U. (in press). “It’s a war! It’s a battle! It’s a fight!”: Do militaristic metaphors increase people’s threat perceptions and support for COVID-19 policies? International Journal of Psychology , https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12797